| |
22.6 Stages of emotional development
There must be appropriate loves and emotions in every cognitive stage in order
to provide the purpose and motivation for thinking through all those cognitive details.
Supporting evidence for the general validity of the theistic structure is therefore
available when emotional as well as cognitive stages are structured in suitable
way. Such emotional development is always directly related to the various loves
which are in the foreground of operations at each stage. We are not like computers,
driven to think without feeling or consciousness. In our minds, even the very smallest
processes require the combined contributions of love and wisdom. Equivalently, we
require emotions and thoughts. Or equivalently again, we require substance and form.22.5Let
us consider emotional development in more detail.
Table 22.4: Eight stages of psychosocial development,
according to (Erikson 1956)
1.
Oral-Sensory |
Birth
to 12 to 18 months |
Trust
vs.
Mistrust |
Feeding
|
The
infant must form a first loving, trusting relationship with
the caregiver, or develop a sense of mistrust. |
2.
Muscular-Anal |
18
months to 3 years |
Autonomy
vs. Shame / Doubt |
Toilet
training |
The
child’s energies are directed toward the development of physical
skills, including walking, grasping, and sphincter control.
|
3.
Locomotor |
3 to
6 years |
Initiative
vs.
Guilt |
Independence
|
The
child continues to become more assertive and to take more initiative,
but may be too forceful, leading to guilt feelings. |
4.
Latency |
6 to
12 years |
Industry
vs.
Inferiority |
School |
The
child must deal with demands to learn new skills or risk a sense
of inferiority, failure and incompetence. |
5.
Adolescence |
12
to 18 years |
Identity
vs.
Role
Confusion |
Peer
relationships |
The
teenager must achieve a sense of identity in occupation, sex
roles, politics, and religion. |
6.
Young Adulthood |
19
to 40 years |
Intimacy
vs.
Isolation |
Love
relationships |
The
young adult must develop intimate relationships or suffer feelings
of isolation. |
7.
Middle Adulthood |
40
to 65 years |
Generativity
vs. Stagnation |
Parenting
|
Each
adult must find some way to satisfy and support the next generation. |
8.
Maturity |
65
to death |
Ego
Integrity vs. Despair |
Reflection
on
& acceptance of one’s life |
The
culmination is a sense of oneself as one is, and of feeling
fulfilled. |
|
Table 22.5: The nine extended Erikson stages of
psychosocial development, arranged in a 3-by-3 grid, after (Gowan 1972).
The ages are only approximate and descriptive.
|
|
CREATIVITY
2 thou
THE OTHER
|
IDENTITY
1 I, me
THE EGO
|
LATENCY
3 it, they
THE WORLD
|
ADULT
|
Erikson
Erikson
Age
|
9 (AGAPE-LOVE)
old age
|
8 EGO-INTEGRITY
Renunciation-wisdom
40 - 65
|
7 GENERATIVITY
Production-care
26-40 (?)
|
YOUTH
|
Erikson
Piaget
Erikson
Age
|
6 INTIMACY
(Creativity)
Love-affiliation
18-25
|
5 IDENTITY
Formal operations
Devotion-fidelity
13-17
|
4 INDUSTRY
Concrete operations
Method-competence
7-12
|
INFANT
|
Erikson
Piaget
Erikson
Age
|
3 INITIATIVE
Intuitive
Direction-purpose
4-6
|
2 AUTONOMY
Pre-operational
Self-control-willpower
2-3
|
1 TRUST
Sensorimotor
Drive-hope
0-1
|
|
The most useful classification of emotional development is that of Erik
Erikson (1956) as displayed in Table
22.4. I now argue, with his widow Joan Serson
Erikson (in Erikson and Erikson (1997)), for a ninth
stage (old age), along with moving forward the years of young-adulthood to 19-25,
middle-adulthood to 25-40, and maturity to 40-65, leaving old age for years 65 and
beyond.
Table 22.6: A renaming for theistic science of
the nine (extended) Erikson levels of psychosocial development, by a modification
of Table 22.5. The cognitive content
of level 6 has been changed from ‘creativity’ as suggested by Gowan, to
‘systematic’ as proposed by (Commons 2008). The
numerical labels have been changed to the decimal system used in this book
to describe sub-parts of degrees.
|
|
LOVE
2 thou
THE WILL
|
THOUGHT
1 I, me
THE INTELLECT
|
ACTION
3 it, they
THE WORLD
|
HIGHER
RATIONAL |
Erikson
Erikson
|
2.11
AGAPE-LOVE
|
2.12
EGO-INTEGRITY
Renunciation-wisdom
|
2.13
GENERATIVITY
Production-care
|
SCIENTIFIC
RATIONAL |
Erikson
Piaget
Erikson
|
2.21
INTIMACY
Systematic
Love-affiliation
|
2.22
IDENTITY
Formal operations
Devotion-fidelity
|
2.23
INDUSTRY
Concrete operations
Method-competence
|
EXTERNAL
MIND |
Erikson
Piaget
Erikson
|
2.31
INITIATIVE
Intuitive
Direction-purpose
|
2.32
AUTONOMY
Pre-operational
Self-control-willpower
|
2.33 TRUST
Sensorimotor
Drive-hope
|
|
I agree with the observation of Gowan (1972) that
these (now) nine stages can be usefully arranged in a 3-by-3 grid, as in Table
22.5. Let us examine separately the columns
and rows of this new ennead and see what is common within the elements of these.
The third column, labeled ‘latency’, is clearly concerned with actions in the world.
The middle column is labeled ‘identity’ but is in all rows concerned with thinking
and preparation of means. The first column, labeled ‘creativity’, is in all rows
concerned with love, purpose and initiative. The three rows can again be readily
identified with the three stages of mentality as displayed in Table
22.3. The lowest row concerns the outermost
actions in the world, the middle row concerns the development of thought and autonomy,
and the first row concerns the application of wisdom and love in our life. This
suggests that Table 22.5 should, within our
theistic science, be rewritten as the levels of Table
22.6. Here, the cognitive content of level
6 has been changed from ‘creativity’ as (suggested by Gowan
(1972)), to ‘systematic’ (as proposed by Commons
(2008a)) and the numerical labels have been changed to the decimal system used
in this book to describe sub-parts of degrees. I claim that the excellent agreement
of this new version with what should be expected within theistic science is good
evidential support for the project of theistic science (noting, of course, that
evidence is best taken from specific observations).
|